Doug Badger: “Members of Congress earn roughly four times the income limit for exchange subsidies, yet will receive subsidies that will be greater, on average, than those who earn as little as $34,000 annually.”
Marriage and Cancer: “The most likely reason,” the authors conclude, “is that married patients have better adherence with prescribed treatments than unmarried patients.” They have someone to watch over them.
I can see why marriage would be good for cancer patients.
Yes, surprisingly there are some benefits
Love the response by Cavuto. “Fox News didn’t re-do basic math, sir: you did.”
Marriage is good for cancer patients.
If with the right partner, marriage is good for everyone!
According to most US statistics on divorce rates that may no longer be the case.
Cavuto responded very assertively. Two thumbs up.
Obama can take his frustrations out on whoever he wants to but his name is literally on this healthcare plan- sorry it’s not working.
Fox News can’t be blamed for informing the people about the chaos that is being caused up on Capitol Hill.
Doug Badger: “Members of Congress earn roughly four times the income limit for exchange subsidies, yet will receive subsidies that will be greater, on average, than those who earn as little as $34,000 annually.”
Sickening
Hey they do some back breaking on the floor- standing for countless hours reading doctor Seuss? I foresee future back problems.
So did Doug Badger just read more in depth than Uwe Reindardt?
Marriage and Cancer: “The most likely reason,” the authors conclude, “is that married patients have better adherence with prescribed treatments than unmarried patients.” They have someone to watch over them.
Interesting conclusion.