Policy Update – 2009/9/28

House leadership fights measure to allow Americans a three day window to read important bills (think: health bill) before Congress votes.

Baucus bill: play or pay or go to jail.

Medicare scare-mongering: That’s what The New York Times says you’re doing if you point out that the Baucus bill would pay for health insurance for the young with $400 billion in cuts for seniors.

Comments (4)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Nancy says:

    We can’t have three days to read the bill? Unbelievable!

  2. Bart Ingles says:

    I can’t believe that 72 hours is sufficient time to examine a large bill anyway. It’s one thing to read through a bill, and quite another to untangle all of the broken grammar, hidden interconnections, and external references.

  3. Devon Herrick says:

    The way the “health reform” game is played these days is to redistribute income from one group to a favored constituency and hope the people getting their ox gored don’t find out about it. Explaining this fact to the group whose ox is getting gored doesn’t strike me a fear mongering.

  4. Brian W. says:

    What’s the point? Very few members of Congress (if any) actually read the bill, whether or not they are given 72 hours to do so.