We Get What We Subsidize
The large majority – 80 percent – of poor, unmarried couples were romantically involved at the time of their child’s birth. In fact, 50 percent of the couples were living together. Fathers almost always visited the mothers and children in the hospital and usually provided financial support. Even better, most of these new parents said that there was a 50-50 chance that they would eventually marry each other. They spoke highly of their partners’ commitment to their children and of their supportiveness.
But within five years, a tiny 15 percent of the unmarried couples had taken wedding vows, while 60 percent had split up. At the five-year mark, only 36 percent of the children lived with their fathers, and half of the other 64 percent hadn’t seen their dads in the last month. One-half to two-thirds of the absent fathers provided little or no financial support…
By the time the children were 5, 20 percent of their mothers had a child by a different man; 27 percent of the kids were living with their mother’s new live-in partner.
Full article on the fragile family effect.
Sad,but true.
I agree with Vicki.
It doesn’t pay low-income couples to get married. Haven’t we all known that for a long, long time?
We get what we subsidize — UNFORTUNATELY.
If we held fathers truly accountable for their children just as much as we do mothers, would we really have this problem?