Victims of Narrow Networks

nM6cXVhbGl0eSg3NSk6c3RyaXBfaWNjKDEpL2h0dHAlM0ElMkYlMkZzMy5hbWF6b25hd3MuY29tJTJGcG1idWNrZXQlMkZzaXRlJTJGYXJ0aWNsZXMlMkY2NTkwNSUyRm9yaWdpbmFsLmpwZw==“I was cautiously optimistic when I heard of the end of the pre-existing condition exclusions for health insurance, but the current law will not help me at all. It does not expand my insurance options, it will definitely NOT be less expensive than what I have now, and if I am forced to see a well-intentioned, overworked and uninformed (or even distracted) doctor, it just might kill me.” (More)

Comments (11)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. JD says:

    “Through a bad roll of the genetic dice, I am the unhappy host for several, rare chronic diseases.”

    Aren’t these the people that this whole reform is based on helping?

  2. Rutledge says:

    “I have owned my own business and paid that higher tax bracket for over 20 years.”

    Speaking of which, shouldn’t there be a tax relief for entrepreneurs? America needs more people who have this drive. I would like to see some form of tax incentive to be formed.

    • Crawford says:

      You would think this would exist, but not exactly. The ACA disincentivizes SMBs to grow larger than 50 employees.

      • Rutledge says:

        Lawmakers simply do not understand business. Let’s hope the private market will be granted more authority to solve the nations problems by the next administration.

  3. Crawford says:

    This plan should have been found as unconstitutional. It forces the citizens of a “free country” into a program that is hurting more people than it is helping.