ObamaCare’s Financial Management Platform Is Still Unbuilt

What difference does that make? A lot, according to the CMS explanation of why it just awarded a $91 million, one-year, no-bid contract to Accenture to complete the job:

rising…[W]ithout a Financial Management platform that accounts for enrollments and associated program costs (i.e. Advance Premium Tax Credits (APTC), Cost Sharing Reductions (CSR), payments to insurance plans, etc.), that integrates with the existing CMS Accounting platform (HIGLAS), the entire healthcare reform program is jeopardized by significantly increasing the following risks: (Emphasis mine)

  • Creating erroneous estimates of budgeted and projected payments associated with operating the FFM;
  • Inaccurate issuance of payments to health plans which could seriously put them at financial risk; potentially leading to their default and disrupting continued services and coverage to consumers;
  • Inaccurate forecasting of Risk Adjustment, Reinsurance, and Risk Corridor; potentially putting the entire health insurance industry at risk; and
  • Failing to support the end of the year reconciliation with IRS; leading to greater program costs for workarounds.

Apparently, the job will not be easy, according to this report:

In terms of complexity, the financial system is a much taller order than the initial HealthCare.gov portal, says Stephen Parente, a health care policy and finance professor at the University of Minnesota, who has been critical of the administration’s overall health care policy.

“Can it be built? Yes. But this is an IT infrastructure project that has no parallel both in terms of money and integration,” he said. “It’s a big deal if Accenture cannot get their act together to move the money.”

…It’s not clear precisely what workarounds are in place to route funds to participating carriers. Parente speculated that some carriers might be able to cover the initial costs in part with additional revenue coming from the uptick in Medicaid enrollment. However, that would apply only to carriers that offer Medicaid plans in states that have opted into the expansion of that program.

“Their anxiety is high,” Parente said about the insurance carriers. “They’re about at the outer limit of how far they can run on spec,” he said.

Comments (8)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Buster says:

    If the government cannot do something relatively simple, like link together databases to HealthCare.gov, it’s no wonder that it cannot create a IT platform for financial management.

  2. Lucas says:

    “What difference does that make? A lot, according to the CMS explanation of why it just awarded a $91 million, one-year, no-bid contract to Accenture to complete the job”

    Oh fantastic, throwing around more money.

    • James M. says:

      Just throwing millions more dollars down the drain. It will definitely cost more after the platform crashes and fails miserably.

  3. Matthew says:

    “…the entire healthcare reform program is jeopardized by significantly increasing the following risks.”

    Well of course it is. If they are still struggling to run the online exchanges, they are going to have struggles with the financial management platform.

  4. Andrew says:

    “The contracting documents praised Accenture for its experience in building and running California’s online exchange.”

    Didn’t California’s small business exchange shut down because of issues? Now to get small business coverage, you have to do it through old fashioned paper applications.

  5. Thomas says:

    I am puzzled as to why everything hadn’t been built and taken care of before opening the exchanges for the public. They could have delayed the marketplace to open this October, and it would have been more successful without all of the technical difficulties.

  6. CRISELDA says:

    THANK YOU FOR THE ARTICLE, VERY INFORMATIVE