Headlines I Wish I Hadn’t Seen

Comments (11)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Perry says:

    Maybe non-alcoholic is better for you, but after reading these headlines, I really need the alcohol.

  2. Bob Hertz says:

    When government programs do not hire enough call center persons to serve the public, I think there are only a few explanations:

    a. the government does not want the program to succeed and be widespread
    (this has been true in some states with Medicaid for years, but I do not think it is true for California),,,,,,,

    b. The program is out of money

    (given the amounts given to computer contractors in all states, what a travesty that is)

    Comments welcome!

  3. Perry says:

    $17 Million would buy a lot of insurance.

  4. Matthew says:

    “Study: Red Wine Is Healthier When It’s Non-Alcoholic”

    Now that is unfortunate. But isn’t non alcoholic red wine basically just grape juice?

  5. Sally says:

    I couldn’t imagine premiums get much higher than they are now. This is a good way to ensure that no one will sign up for ObamaCare health insurance.

    • Thomas says:

      I wonder how they were able to state things like “household premiums will fall 25% thanks to Obamacare?” Did they not take into account all factors?

  6. Andrew says:

    So are they relying on advertising or word of mouth? I thought the thing Obama was saying is to tell everyone about the marketplace. Now they spend insane amounts of money advertising for it.

  7. James M. says:

    “Emergency Visits Up in Massachusetts After Reforms Enacted”

    That’s not surprising. It will be the same way after ObamaCare as well. Get ready for some busy ERs.

  8. Buddy says:

    “Nearly half of callers to California’s health insurance exchange in February and March couldn’t get through and abandoned their call”

    Can you blame them? I gave up on Obama’s call a long time ago.