Important Hearing
But here is a way to liven it up: George Will’s questions for Elena Kagan below the fold.
These are some hypothetical questions for Ms. Kagan that could logically follow from an individual mandate to purchase health insurance:
- If Congress decides that interstate commerce is substantially affected by the costs of obesity, may Congress require obese people to purchase participation in programs such as Weight Watchers? If not, why not?
- The government having decided that Chrysler’s survival is an urgent national necessity, could it decide that “Cash for Clunkers” is too indirect a subsidy and instead mandate that people buy Chrysler products?
- If Congress concludes that ignorance has a substantial impact on interstate commerce, can it constitutionally require students to do three hours of homework nightly? If not, why not?
- Can you name a human endeavor that Congress cannot regulate on the pretense that the endeavor affects interstate commerce? If courts reflexively defer to that congressional pretense, in what sense do we have limited government?
I like George Will’s questions.
The expression on Kagan’s face (as well as the gentleman behind her) illustrates how interesting these proceedings must be.
Here is Sen. Coburn asking a George Will type question. Kagen’s answer is far from reassuring: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSoWGlyugTo
It’s not unconstitutional for the govenment to tell us what to eat? That is kind of scary.
I would say it’s pretty clear how she is going to vote on the constitutionality of ObamaCare.
Amen, Ken.