Henry Miller: Monumental Callousness and Stupidity, if Not Outright Malfeasance
This is Miller, writing in Forbes:
A simple five-step checklist intended to prevent catheter-related infections in Michigan hospital ICUs…includ[ed] washing hands with soap and cleaning a patient’s skin with antiseptic. But because researchers were planning to assess the results of implementing the checklist, their work met the strict definition of “research” and therefore required patients’ formal informed consent, the approval of institutional review boards, and other expensive and time-consuming red tape.
Because the researchers had not jumped through all of these hoops, the federal human research office actually stopped the study–in spite of the fact that the checklist was associated with a 66% reduction in infections throughout the state of Michigan, saving over 1,500 lives and $200 million in the first 18 months alone.
Yet another horror story from the history of bureacracy.
And an unsurprising horror story, considering this is health care bureaucracy.
It’s amazing how institutional review boards become obstacles to quality improvement rather than promoting better patient care. There’s enough research to support the measures mentioned that implementing these common-sense protocols should not involve begging for permission from a review board. Indeed, not following them should be a breach of acceptable practice guidelines.
I’m not sure I understand. Doctors can’t use the checklist because they don’t have patients’ consent? That doesn’t even make sense.
Leave it to the federal government to make up a rule like that.