Maybe There is More Quality Competition Than We Realize

092112hospitals_512x288The researchers found that hospitals with higher survival rates net of the cost of treatment were rewarded with more patients. More specifically, if in a given year hospital A had 10 percent higher productivity than hospital B, hospital A tended to have 25 percent higher market share that year and to experience 4 percent more growth over the subsequent five years.

The team also found that the variation in survival rates was more important in driving market share than the variation in cost was. In other words, patients seem to seek out hospitals with better survival rates but not ones with lower costs.

More from Pete Orszag.

Comments (15)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. JD says:

    As long as people are able to make decisions, this will happen.

  2. Lucas says:

    “patients seem to seek out hospitals with better survival rates but not ones with lower costs.”

    This would seem accurate to me.

  3. Connor says:

    “Both of these studies were carefully done, but there are still reasons to be cautious about concluding that hospitals are really wondrous examples of productivity. For example, the Chandra paper examined only one condition, yet hospitals treat a lot more than just heart attacks.”

    A bit misleading

  4. Rutledge says:

    “Yet the report also suggested the principal driver of such [pricing] variation is not hospitals but rather post-acute-care services — such as skilled nursing facilities, rehabilitation facilities, home health services and hospices.”

    Interesting finding.

  5. Dr. Rumbitter says:

    Another great post John! There truly is more quality competition than we realize!

  6. Dewaine says:

    As health care continues to consolidate among a handful of providers, quality competition will diminish.