In all my years of interest in health economics, I cannot recall a study quite as stunning as the one that appeared last week in the New England Journal of Medicine.
The conventional wisdom among health experts across the ideological spectrum is that people need health insurance to get good health care. Indeed, to some politicians the terms "no health care" and "no health insurance" are interchangeable. Almost as widely accepted is the view that some health plans deliver better health care than others. But the new study shatters those assumptions. Continue reading New Study→
How can patients make good choices if they cannot compare prices and quality of service in the marketplace? This is the problem of transparency. Yet while pundits talk and politcians threaten to legislate, the private sector already has developed the tools to solve these problems.
A model developed by HealthMarket allows its insureds to compare the price they will pay for 20,000 procedures performed by virtually every doctor in the country.
A product developed by Simbro allows patients to compare quality and price data for most hospitals in the country.
A product developed by eMedicalfiles creates needed transparency for doctors — it allows medical records to travel electronically as patients go from doctor to doctor and hospital to hospital.
The NCPA is holding a briefing on these techonologies on Tuesday.
The latest issue of National Review has my analysis of the President's new health policy proposals. In addition to a stronger-than-ever push for Health Savings Accounts, the President is calling for tax fairness (giving individually purchased insurance the same tax break as insurance obtained at work), portable health insurance, special HSAs for the chronically ill and allowing consumers to shop for insurance in a national marketplace.
On Tuesday night, President Bush devoted only a few sentences to health policy. At the same time, the administration released a five-page document describing the President's health policy proposals. The reforms described therein are so sweeping and so bold that I would compare them to Hillary Clinton's proposals of a decade ago.
I don't know if the White House will devote the energy and political capital necessary to see this through. But if they do, these reforms will leave a lasting mark on social policy in this country.
The Wall Street Journal this morning published my online "debate" on consumer driven health care with Joe Antos (AEI) and Robert Reischauer (Urban Institute). It also includes many readers' email comments.
Tis the season for debate. I debated Uwe Reinhardt (Princeton) at the CDHC conference in Washington last week, but Uwe wouldn't agree to allow the event to be taped and C-Span couldn't make it anyway. Today, Bob Reischauer (former head of CBO, now head of Urban Institute) and I debate many of the same issues – with help from Joe Antos of AEI – on the Wall Street Journal. You can view the debate for free today only. After today, you will not be able to access the debate unless you are a Wall Street Journal subscriber.