Marriage Penalties in ObamaCare

Health insurance premium credits in the new law are linked not directly to income, but to the poverty line, resulting in a particularly steep marriage penalty for low-income Americans. With $10,890 as the poverty line for one person and an additional $3,820 for a spouse, marriage means less government help with health insurance.

 Two singles would each be able to earn $43,000 and still receive help to purchase health insurance, but if they got married and combined their earnings to $86,000, they would be far above the limit. As a married couple, the most they could earn and still get government help with health insurance premiums would be $58,000, a difference of almost $30,000, or 32 percent. This is a substantial disincentive to getting married, or to working while married.

 Testimony of  Diana Furchtgott-Roth.

Comments (4)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Buster says:

    I thought sound public policy was supposed to encourage marriage rather than penalize it.

  2. Paul H. says:

    Good study.

  3. Brian Williams. says:

    There’s no doubt that Congress will try to solve this problem by raising taxes on the rich.

    A surtax on millionaires has become the solution to all our problems.

  4. Leon from Redding Ca says:

    We now are finding that family members of a worker recieving employer single coverage insurance are unable to get subsidized health insurance through the new health care exchanges.
    http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/190753-if-you-like-your-plan-you-can-keep-it-yet-you-might-not-want-to

    states “Because any offer of employer insurance coverage— whether or not it’s considered affordable — blocks access to generous subsidies in the insurance exchange, millions of families will be stuck in a no-man’s-land without affordable coverage through their employer or the exchange”
    Another great feature of ACA, get divorced so your family has health insurance, go figure.