Hits and Misses

Comments (17)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Brad says:

    Administration to question “hundreds of thousands” of ObamaCare applicants to re-determine eligibility for subsidies.”

    This is not shocking in the least bit. Ever since its implementation, the whole process has been bungled. Just take a look at this Forbes article!

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2014/06/12/federal-bungling-of-obamacare-verification-creating-nationwide-chaos-in-medicaid-departments/

  2. Matthew says:

    “Stop me if you’ve heard this before: Kentucky hospital sees 12 percent surge in emergency-department visits under ObamaCare.”

    This is a broken record that just keeps on playing. Everywhere will see ER visits increase under ObamaCare.

    • Thomas says:

      “We’re seeing patients who probably should be seen at our (immediate-care centers),”

      This is because they can’t be seen at these centers. Since wait times and access to care is difficult, they will use the ER as an alternative.

  3. James M. says:

    “two million reported personal information that differed from data in government records, according to federal officials and Serco, the company hired to resolve such inconsistencies.”

    Are there any checks that enrollees have to go through to be sure of accurate information? If not, it probably differs from people trying to game the system.

  4. Andrew says:

    I had to Google what watercress was. Which probably accurately describes the state of my health…

    • Steve says:

      Watercress: that weird looking green in your salad you’re never truly sure is edible.

  5. Devon Herrick says:

    American Hospital Association wants Medicare claims audits stopped

    The relevant question: does the OIG find errors that are missed by the Medicare recovery audits? If so, does the amount recovered through OIG audits exceed the cost of OIG audits? In economic terms, a profit maximizing activity should be conducted until the last dollar of input equals the last dollars of output.

  6. Devon Herrick says:

    U.S. judge strikes down rule forcing drug companies to discount drugs for hospitals.

    A few years ago only about 6,000 hospitals and clinics qualified for the 340B discount drug program. Under the PPACA, this number was expected to rise to something like 20,000. I don’t believe the ruling effect the hospitals and clinics that were recipients prior to the ACA.

    Many policy wonks argue this amounts to a giveaway to clinics that make a huge profit on the drugs. It’s been suggested that some clinics were able to reap huge windfalls by ordering more discounted drugs than needed then selling them to other hospitals and clinics at a huge markup. That may be an egregious anecdote that rarely occurs. Yet, drug makers have a quota system to restrict the amount of drugs sold to reflect historic purchases to prevent arbitrage.

  7. Freedom Lover says:

    Gee, what a surprise that so many people’s reported incomes differs from what they report in order to get other people’s money to help purchase a product that we now have to buy.

    Do you think the administration will go after these people as hard as they went after the IRS for unfairly targeting conservative groups?

  8. Lacey says:

    If anyone could figure out what watercress is, we’d probably eat it. I’ve never seen it, but it sounds gross.