Hits and Misses

Comments (11)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. CBrady says:

    I can see why marriage would be good for cancer patients.

  2. PJ says:

    Love the response by Cavuto. “Fox News didn’t re-do basic math, sir: you did.”

  3. CJ says:

    Marriage is good for cancer patients.
    If with the right partner, marriage is good for everyone!

  4. Rutledge says:

    Cavuto responded very assertively. Two thumbs up.

    Obama can take his frustrations out on whoever he wants to but his name is literally on this healthcare plan- sorry it’s not working.

    • Paige says:

      Fox News can’t be blamed for informing the people about the chaos that is being caused up on Capitol Hill.

  5. MCC says:

    Doug Badger: “Members of Congress earn roughly four times the income limit for exchange subsidies, yet will receive subsidies that will be greater, on average, than those who earn as little as $34,000 annually.”


    • Mikey says:

      Hey they do some back breaking on the floor- standing for countless hours reading doctor Seuss? I foresee future back problems.

  6. Chris says:

    So did Doug Badger just read more in depth than Uwe Reindardt?

  7. Paige says:

    Marriage and Cancer: “The most likely reason,” the authors conclude, “is that married patients have better adherence with prescribed treatments than unmarried patients.” They have someone to watch over them.

    Interesting conclusion.