Common Sense Solution to Opioid Abuse is Being Ignore

With opioid addiction on the rise, Congress has taken up the issue of drug abuse. This week the U.S. House will likely approve more than $100 million in funds for substance abuse treatment and training for emergency medical technicians and emergency room personnel. Many Democrats in Congress are requesting even more — much more. Some Democrats think an additional $600 million is needed to combat drug abuse and slow the epidemic of drug overdoses.

For all the talk about ways to deal with the problem of opioid abuse there appears to be little discussion on a commonsense solution to prevent it from increasing. A policy often proposed is mandatory electronic prescribing of narcotic drugs.


Mandatory e-prescribing of controlled substances provides the electronic checks and balances to a system that is already in place. Ironically, although doctors have been using electronic prescribing of non-controlled substances for a few years, until recently federal regulations prevented e-prescribing of controlled substances due to the perceived risks of drug abuse and diversion of narcotics to the black market. Electronic prescribing of controlled substances is now permitted in all 50 states. However, not all pharmacies — and even fewer physicians’ office — are prepared to transmit prescriptions electronically.


Estimates vary but about 12 percent of prescriptions are for controlled substances. That adds up to nearly 1 pill in every 8 dispensed. Of all the chronic diseases and conditions that exist — hypertension, high cholesterol, heart disease, chronic indigestion, emphysema, diabetes and cancer to name a few – the notion that 12 percent of all drugs prescribed are for powerful narcotic pain relievers defies common sense. Obviously, this huge amount represents drugs diverted to the illicit market, abused and used recreationally. Inadequate tracking of controlled substances drives up costs for drug plans, employers, insurers, taxpayers and society as a whole. An analysis performed nearly a decade ago found that every $1 worth of drugs lost to fraud was associated with $41 in medical costs lost to abuse. Doctor shopping, the side effects of addiction, and unnecessary emergency room visits for intense pain where the addict hopes to get a narcotic pain reliever boosts the cost of drug abuse.


Opioid abuse has taken hold of entire regions of the country. The reality is prescription opioid drugs are yet another product in the illicit drug trade. There are multiple causes, but one is that prescription opioids have historically been easy to obtain for recreational purposes. Prescription opioids are cheaper and often easier to get than illegal drugs, the mere possession of which could get you arrested. With a little persistence and creativity, oxycodone, hydrocodone and soma can be obtained from retail pharmacies for retail prices — rather than the marked-up street price or the price for illegal drugs smuggled in from abroad. For instance, $200 spend on Oxycodone at a retail pharmacy would cost $1,100 to $2,400 on the street.

Until recently, many physicians were too lenient when prescribing narcotic drugs and physician-owned pill mills were common. This is changing. Thinly veiled physician pain management practices — so-called pill mills — have been shut down in many states. But doctor shopping — that is, seeing multiple doctors for prescription narcotics, is still common. This method fools many doctors because their patients are seemingly adhering to safe protocols. Not one doctor realizes their patients are seeing three, four or five other doctors in search of quantities of pills no one doctor would prescribe. Without proper management, legitimate patients experiencing significant pain can sometimes become addicted to their pain medications. Worse, many pain patients are merely people faking symptoms to get drugs. The danger is that at some point prescription opioids will no longer satisfy their cravings and some addicts move on to stronger drugs like heroin.

The way mandatory e-prescribing of controlled substances works is that when a patient sees their doctor and is prescribed, say, 30 Oxycodone tablets for pain, the prescription is entered into a computer system that only a doctor could access. Sometimes this system requires two people to approve (or validate) the prescription — preventing the doctor, a nurse or anyone else from ordering drugs for themselves or friends. The prescription can be sent a specific pharmacy or a paper voucher could even allow patients to choose a pharmacy, which would then authenticate the prescription order. When a patient visits his or her pharmacy, the pharmacy computer system would have to ping the physician computer system to validated the prescription and verify no other pharmacy had filled the prescription. The pharmacist and other prescribing doctors would be alerted if two, three or five other physicians also prescribed narcotic painkillers to the same patient. This system would also track customers who currently pay cash for their prescription to avoid tracking by their drug plan.


There are obstacles to a mandatory electronic prescribing of controlled substances. Some barriers need to be removed to speed successful implementation. The DEA has been held up the process in New York State. New York State is the first state to require all prescriptions for controlled substances to go through the system. Mandatory electronic prescribing of narcotics took effect in New York State in March 2016 after being postponed for a year.



Comments (6)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Big Truck Joe says:

    Don’t leave out the top 3 pharmaceutical distributors – McKesson, Cardinal and AmerisourceBergen – which disburse 85% of all meds to pharmacies in the US. If they’re distributing a ton of opioids to the same pharmacies, then the Board of Pharmacy of the state and DEA should investigate those pharmacies. And if during the investigation they find overprescribing doctors, then they should be investigated. In other words E-prescribing and self reporting of opioids by doctors and pharmacies of abused controlled substances could stop the problem tomorrow. It’s just that the Dept of Justice has far more important issues to deal with like the gender of bathroom users in South Carolina to have time to deal with OxyContin abuse in the US.

    • Devon Herrick says:

      I agree that tracking prescriptions should not be a big deal. Medicare doesn’t even allow Part D drug plans who discover abuse to do anything about it.

  2. Allan (formally Al) says:

    We worry a lot about people that abuse drugs, but we shouldn’t forget those that need these drugs and aren’t getting enough because of heavy-handed tactics.

    • Devon Herrick says:

      I just read an article that said 10 percent of those on opioids also test positive for illicit drugs. I read closer and discovered the most used drug was marijuana. I’m not going to judge a pain patient who uses marijuana. Now if they were on heroin or cocaine I’d be more worried.

      • Allan (formally Al) says:

        The question I have is whether government is doing more harm than good. I suspect the latter and in the process is causing pain to those that actually need treatment.

        Doctors will try and get other doctors to write these needed prescriptions due to fear.

  3. Lori says:

    My step-mom is on an opioid (Hydrooxycodone- generic Percocet)and she is 80 years old. She has severe stenosis of the spine, osteo-arthritis, and a host of other issues. She takes half a pill as needed (she says a whole pill makes her loopy). She has pain that radiates down her leg from her hip and lower back region from the stenosis. This past week she ran out of pills (Tues) and I went to her doctor to get her prescription and took it to her pharmacy where I was told she could not get this prescription filled until Friday as the insurance company would not pay for it until then. She was out of pills for 3 days and in a lot of pain. She was told to take Tylenol, which she says does ‘nothing’ as it does not help her pain.
    Is she addicted? Most likely as she’s been on them for over 4 years. Does she need them? Yes. Is it fair to withhold pain medication for someone in pain? No.
    She is disabled and rarely leaves the house. Few people come to see her, and of those of us who do, none of us use prescription drugs or illicit drugs.
    These rules hurt those who need pain medications. Those who want to abuse drugs will find a way to do so, which is proven over and over again by those who make and sell Meth and other drugs from household items. I am not for the abuse of drugs, but I am also not for the restriction of drugs for those who truly need them.