Si, se Puede: “CastroCare in Crisis”

Although Cuba’s government commits 16 percent of its budget to health care, the communist dictatorship’s real health-care “system” is dedicated to serving cash-paying customers from Canada and other countries. This comes from a fascinating article in the latest issue of Foreign Affairs, “CastroCare in Crisis,” by Laurie Garrett of the Council on Foreign Relations.

It’s not news that The Castro brothers profit from medical tourism. Michael Moore infamously shilled for the enterprising Havana Hospital in his movie, SiCKO, where he brought 9/11 Ground Zero rescue workers to be treated. The Havana Hospital appears to be a more competitive, patient-centered enterprise than any American general hospital I’ve seen: It posts prices for its services, reports testimonials, and can schedule surgeries on short notice (three days for open-heart surgery!

Garrett explains that the hospitals that serve foreigners are owned by a government-owned tourism conglomerate, and serve patients from 70 different countries.  Canadians are significant customers. Like Cuba, Canada controls access to medical services through a government monopoly, so citizens cannot get timely care. Unlike Cuba, Canada allows the rest of the economy to operate freely, so Canadians are rich enough to be able to pay just under $7,000 for knee replacements in Cuba (instead of waiting for months in Canada).

But what will happen when the Castros are gone? Two competing effects, according to Garrett: An influx of U.S. patients who will be free to travel to Cuba for treatment, but an exodus of physicians who will be free to emigrate to the U.S.  Plus Cuba has the second oldest population in the Americas, with only one quarter of the population under 40 years of age. Once the Cuban people are free of communism, their pent-up demand for medical care will also explode. Cuban patients (as opposed to Canadian patients in Cuba) already have to provide their own syringes, sheets, and towels. Soap, disinfectant, and sterile equipment are rare. (See John Goodman’s previous post here.)

Unfortunately, Garrett does not consider the consequences of ObamaCare, which will likely accelerate the international travel of U.S. patients, while minimizing the emigration of Cuban doctors. If Cuba becomes a free society that welcomes foreign capital, American investors will soon decide that investing in hospitals that serve U.S. and other foreign patients is a good bet. There will be plenty of opportunities for Cuban surgeons who stay at home.

Comments (8)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Tom H. says:

    This is the rest of the story. The part that somehow Michael Moore missed.

  2. Greg says:

    The solution to the mMichael Moore problem is to send him to Cuba for his medical care. Of course, someone else posting here has already recommended sending Moore to North Korea. So I say if he survives one country, ship him directly to the other.

  3. Vicki says:

    Pardon my ignorance, but what does “Si, se Puede” mean?

  4. Jessica says:

    Si, Se Puede means “yes we can.”

  5. Ken says:

    Why stop with Michael Moore? How about Nancy Pelosi? Harry Reid? We could probably fill the Queen Mary with the boatload of people who truly deserve to experience single payer care first hand.

  6. Ian Random says:

    Interesting that Ground Zero workers would travel to Cuba for anti-inflammatories.

    http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6741-ct-scans-explain-mysterious-911-cough.html

  7. Tinkertom says:

    Don’t forget all 400 of the names on the “Journolist”, (the reporters that plotted to protect Obama and slander Palin)they each deserve a seat on that QE2 vacation. Preferably sur le pointe and in the rain.

  8. Dave Hennig says:

    Though the Foreign Affairs article “CastroCare” is cited I see no evidence in the comments made that anyone here has read it?