4 thoughts on “Obesity Update – 2007/7/28”

  1. I notice that there are again calls for taxes on fattening foods. But why be indirect? If there is a social case to be made for discouraging obesity, why not tax fat people directly, based on their weight or BMI?

  2. Greg, have you not noticed? We’re not even close to taxing obesity. We are subsidizing it.

  3. If they want to tax fattening foods, they should slap a tax on anything with “low fat” on the label.

    Then again, they could probably slap a tax on any food carrying a label.

  4. The United States is arguably one of only a few countries in the world so wealthy that a recession causes people to gain weight. Possible explanation: Calorie-dense foods like beans, pastas and rise are what economists refer to as “inferior goods” compared to more costly foods like fresh fruits, vegetables and lean meats. As income falls, people substitute the lower-cost fattening foods for higher-cost healthy foods. Also, food functions as a substitute entertainment for more costly leisure activities. As money becomes tight, people apparently cut back in other ways and boost their food intake. Or maybe they just eat when they’re nervous!

Comments are closed.