Marginal Tax Rates in the New Health Insurance Exchanges
Starting in 2014, subsidies will be available to families with incomes between 134% and 400% of the federal poverty line. (Families earning less than 134% of poverty are eligible for Medicaid.) For example, a family of four headed by a 55-year-old earning $31,389 in 2014 dollars (134% of the federal poverty line) in a high-cost area will get a subsidy of $22,740. This will cover 96% of an insurance policy that the Kaiser Family Foundation predicts will cost $23,700. A similar family earning $93,699 (400% of poverty) gets a subsidy of $14,799. But a family earning $1 more—$93,700—gets no subsidy.
To phase out the subsidy smoothly for families with incomes of 134% to 400% of poverty, the law would have to take away $22,700 in subsidies as a family’s income rose to $93,700 from $31,389. In other words, for every dollar earned in this income range, a family’s subsidy would have to decline by 36 cents. On top of 25% federal income taxes, 5% state income taxes, and 15% Social Security taxes, this implies a reward to work of less than 20 cents on the dollar—in economists’ language, an implicit marginal tax rate of over 80%.
Full article on the consequences of Obamacare’s subsidies.
Sounds awful. I think I have seen material like this before at your site.
This makes no economic sense at all.
Ditto Tom’s comment.
These subsidies will do nothing, except make the policies more “affordable,” thus increasing premiums even more.
As I understand it, the subsidies are tied to the CPI, so if health insurance costs exceed the CPI, the subsidies represent a smaller percentage of the premiums, right?
Don Levit
Very Informative Site!!!!
It really helps me a lot.
Thanks for sharing this.
http://www.tryphenocal.com/