“Between 2014 and 2022, the increase in national health spending (which the Medicare actuaries specifically attribute to ObamaCare) amounts to $7,450 per family of four.”
Nearly $1000 a year… many people can’t afford that. Obama’s war on the poor continues.
“Between 2014 and 2022, the increase in national health spending (which the Medicare actuaries specifically attribute to ObamaCare) amounts to $7,450 per family of four.”
Nearly $1000 a year… many people can’t afford that. Obama’s war on the poor continues.
“HHS: Individual health insurance premiums will rise by 99% for young men and 62% for young women.”
This goes here.
Oh, is this the “government is terrible for the people who can least afford more burden” section?
I’d be interested to see if it held true for more than just colon cancer.
Hopefully they think it is important to see.
Or they just want funding for another study and don’t really care about the outcomes, but that’s the pessimistic view.
“NBER study: There is no statically significant relationship between hospital prices and quality (as measured by colon cancer surgery mortality).”
Wow. Incentives have certainly been perverted.
Right, this speaks to how convoluted the system really is.
“An internal Senate memo warns lawmakers and their staff not to sign up for ObamaCare’s health insurance exchanges just yet.”
This whole thing stinks and they know it does. You only get special privileges if you are a member of the politburo… smh.
“Government regulation may prevent personalized medicine from reaching its potential.”
What doesn’t government prevent from reaching its potential?
“HHS: Individual health insurance premiums will rise by 99% for young men and 62% for young women.”
Sounds like sexism to me.
“Government regulation may prevent personalized medicine from reaching its potential.”
When has government regulation helped something achieve it’s potential?
Oh, you know, roads and bridges and aerospace, nothing major.
That’s government funding, not regulation.
Can’t have one without the other.